Putting aside my specific opinions about SCO and its current strategy of
creating new "revenue opportunities"...
Does anybody else share the opinion that this commercial/advertising
post crosses a line? Do we have a specific policy about such posts?
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 11:27, Frank Roberts - SOTL wrote:
> Hi All
>
> On August 17 - 19, 2003 SCO Group and its Strategic Business Partners
> are presenting SCOForm 2003 in Las Vegas.
>
> Emphasing
>
> New products,
> new emphasis,
> new players,
> new revenue opportunities
> at SCOForum 2003
>
> For complete and full details see:
> http://www.sco.com/2003forum/
>
> I personally wish that I could attesd so that I could demonstrate my
> afirmative support and admisitration for SOC new emphasis and revenue
> opportunities.
> http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/os/story/0,2000048630,20277173,00.htm
>
> One only needs to recall the dynamatic fire works display that SOC had aranged
> for Linux World only to be grosely under clased by the dirty tricks of IBM
> and Red Hat filing unmentional responses to their attempted thief of SOC
> intellectual property rights as detailed by GROKLAW:
>
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/
>
> to realize that SOC has an even greater fireworks display arranged for
> SOC2003.
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
--
klash | | Child Logic: An unbreakable toy is useful
.|. .|. for breaking other toys.
.|||. .|||.
.:::::::.:::::::.