[ltp] FN+F4 & APMD?
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 22:57:23 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:30:35PM +0100, Andr=E9 Wyrwa wrote:
> ...from what i found out now, my problem was that i had AC power online
> AND a pcmcia card in use.
(My old ThinkPad 755CD refused to suspend if a network/modem PCMCIA card
was inserted. The manual mentioned that.)
> I found several sources which tell the same story:
> When using apm --suspend, apm signals to apmd which calls apmd_proxy and
> after that finishes calls kernel apm to suspend.
> When using Fn+F4 or tpctl -Z apmd shouldn't even be called, because both
> signal the bios directly which acts before apmd has a chance to react at
That does not match my understanding of how things work. Fn+F4
definitely signals apmd, and waits for it. If I plug out a network
cable without unmounting a networked FS, and then hit Fn+F4, the suspend
pauses for 30 seconds, and I later on I can see messages in syslog about
apmd killing apmd_call_proxy after a timeout. I commented out a couple of
'sleep 1' lines in some apm.d scripts to make suspends faster.
If I boot a kernel without APM support, Fn+F4 just does nothing at all.
> The problem on my side was now that the bios for some reason rejects a
> suspend, when both a pcmcia card and AC power are in place.
Strange. I think I had an old 10Mbit 16-bit PCMCIA netcard somewhere.
Perhaps I'll give it a try. I seem to remember that suspending with a
802.11b CardBus card worked fine. I do not remember if the laptop was
on AC power at the time.
> I wonder that apmd reacts on the Fn+F4 press on your machine.?.
"If we were meant to fly, we wouldn't keep losing our luggage."
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----