[ltp] Re: Generic battery interface

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > textual
> 
> good for shell scripts, not clear it is better for C programs
> that have to open a bunch of files by name.
> 
> > sysfs was great for develping tp_smapi
> 
> Wonderful, but isn't the key here how simple it is for HAL
> or X to understand and use the kernel API rather than the
> developers of the kernel driver that implements the API?
> 
> If X were a shell script, I'd say a file per value would
> clearly be the way to go, but it isn't.

Well, lets say "if we go the /dev/XXX way, maintainer will probably
have to create small utility to make battery info available from the
shell".
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html