[ltp] IBM/Lenovo policy on Linux ThinkPad support, vs. competition
Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:38:25 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 17:28, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> And no, we don't want meaningless "yes it boots" certifications 
> and buggy closed-source drivers  that work only on a specific
> version of a specific Linux distribution. We do want to control our
> battery charging thresholds under Linux the same way Windows users
> can; and our fans to stop pulsing unnecessarily ; and active hard
> disk protection that actually works; and power saving for our GPUs;
> and disk upgrades that don't cause an "Error 2010" . Browse
> ThinkWiki  and the list archives  for some more examples.
> Achieving this requires release of the relevant hardware
> specifications (or free and well-documented driver code), access to
> Lenovo engineers for reporting bugs, and the ability to create,
> maintain and enhance open source drivers without fear of Lenovo's
> legal battalion.
Lenovo engineers has written linux drivers for hardware related parts
of ThinPads for their SLED campain. Why not merge this code and
information together with tp_smapi and perhaps ibm_acpi?
The linux thinkpad community is more then happy to help Lenovo
developing drivers and merge it into the main kernel tree.
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----