[ltp] Virtualization in x60

Chris Zhang linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:02:22 +1000


This is a multipart message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C6E423.B45649E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>> Why is not possible to use the VT feature present in the core duo=20

>> processors with our x60*?

=20

>I had no problem using VT-x with Parallels under BIOS 1.04 with my =
x60s.  I=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2ve upgraded to BIOS 1.10, but =
haven=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2t >tested parallels as I got sick and tired =
of how buggy it is under Linux.  (How I wish for an open-source VT-x =
capable >virtualizer that works well with laptops=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C2=A6)

>     =C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=80=9DJustin

=20

You sure what you were using was VT-x? Is there an option in your bios =
1.10 that lets you turn on and off VT-x? Even though cat /proc/cpuinfo =
may give you vmx under flag section, to be able to use it you need a =
VMM(virtual machine monitor), a VT-x capable CPU and a VT-x capable =
Bios. I have a X60 and I tried to use Xen to virtualize windows xp using =
hardware assisted virtualization(VT-x), but an error came up and said =
VT-x was not enabled in my system. I have the latest BIOS 1.10, T2400 =
Core Duo CPU(has VT-x), but there is no such option in my BIOS that lets =
me turn on and off VT-x.

=20

Parallel supports VT-x, that may or may not mean it won=E2=80=99t work =
without VT-x, so just because you can run windows through parallel, that =
doesn=E2=80=99t mean it is definitely running on VT-x. I=E2=80=99d be =
very happy if you can tell me how you got your VT-x working though.

=20

Cheers

=20

Chris=20

=20


------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C6E423.B45649E0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dutf-8">
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>

<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Consolas;
	panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0cm;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
	margin:0cm;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:10.5pt;
	font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:windowtext;}
span.PlainTextChar
	{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
	font-family:Consolas;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>

<body lang=3DEN-AU link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoPlainText>&gt;&gt; Why is not possible to use the VT =
feature
present in the core duo <o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoPlainText>&gt;&gt; processors with our =
x60*?<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoPlainText><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoPlainText>&gt;I had no problem using VT-x with Parallels =
under BIOS
1.04 with my x60s.&nbsp; I=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2ve upgraded to BIOS =
1.10, but
haven=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2t &gt;tested parallels as I got sick and =
tired of how buggy
it is under Linux.&nbsp; (How I wish for an open-source VT-x capable
&gt;virtualizer that works well with =
laptops=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C2=A6)<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoPlainText>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=80=9DJustin<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal>You sure what you were using was VT-x? Is there an =
option in
your bios 1.10 that lets you turn on and off VT-x? Even though cat
/proc/cpuinfo may give you vmx under flag section, to be able to use it =
you
need a VMM(virtual machine monitor), a VT-x capable CPU and a VT-x =
capable
Bios. I have a X60 and I tried to use Xen to virtualize windows xp using =
hardware
assisted virtualization(VT-x), but an error came up and said VT-x was =
not
enabled in my system. I have the latest BIOS 1.10, T2400 Core Duo =
CPU(has
VT-x), but there is no such option in my BIOS that lets me turn on and =
off
VT-x.<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal>Parallel supports VT-x, that may or may not mean it
won=E2=80=99t work without VT-x, so just because you can run windows =
through
parallel, that doesn=E2=80=99t mean it is definitely running on VT-x. =
I=E2=80=99d
be very happy if you can tell me how you got your VT-x working =
though.<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal>Cheers<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal>Chris <o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C6E423.B45649E0--