[ltp] X60 - (bad) experience, others?

Adrian Walker linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:05:26 -0500


------=_Part_4238_31145345.1202069126418
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi All --

Now that's a mystery.  On my X60s, Linux Fedora Core6 yields much _longer_
battery life than Vista.

Maybe different Linux versions differ in this regard?

                                           Cheers,  -- Adrian

Internet Business Logic
A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com    Shared use is free

Adrian Walker
Reengineering

On 2/3/08, Tim Niemeyer <tim.niemeyer@mastersword.de> wrote:
>
> Hallo Ari,
>
> I have a X61s and have the same problems...
> What makes this difference on power consumption between windows and linux?
>
> * Ari El <ari.reads@gmail.com> [02-02-08 12:16]:
> > From: Ari El <ari.reads@gmail.com>
> > To: linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
> > Subject: Re: [ltp] X60 - (bad) experience, others?
> > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:16:07 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >
> > I have an X60s (1702, Core Duo (not core2)) with and 8-cell battery
> pack.
> >
> > What I'd say is: the bad experience on the X60s is with Linux. The
> machine
> > itself is awesome.
> >
> > I've had it for a year and a half; with WinXP it is really fast for most
> > purposes, runs cold, and after all this time it is still giving me 8 to
> 9h
> > of battery life when used for writing (word) and light surfing (wireless
> > on), 30 or 40% brightness. Consumption averages an awesome 7.5W, and
> I've
> > seen it going to 6W with wireless off. It wakes up from hibernation in
> 15
> > seconds or so. And all this is with no SSD drive... yet!
> >
> > I installed dual-boot Linux in the x60s the day I bought it, and kept
> > re-installing all new ubuntu releases. Everything basically works (save
> for
> > the fingerprint reader, although I heard it is possible to make it
> work).
> > Even after tweaking, power consumption averages 10 to 11W for the same
> usage
> > pattern as above.
> >
> > I bought the machine to carry it around, so I'm still booting winxp on
> it. I
> > can't wait for the day linux will give me a comparable battery life. I
> > switched to linux in every other machine at the office and at home, but
> not
> > in my x60s, yet.
> >
> > I'm sure  powertop, the tickless kernel mode and other good work of
> intel
> > and other folks will eventually trickle down the chain and we will
> > eventually get there. I thought this was going to faster though.
> I don't think this things will help for longer battery life... :-(
>
>
> Tim Niemeyer
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHpcmkGbn/Eak8UZYRAgI4AJ0eqa17YBAYbFUPlJHuQy5HqKdfDACguWQT
> PcQRUwyankzFqmv5AcVK8WE=
> =J1NW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

------=_Part_4238_31145345.1202069126418
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi All --<br>
<br>
Now that&#39;s a mystery.&nbsp; On my X60s, Linux Fedora Core6 yields much _longer_ battery life than Vista.<br>
<br>
Maybe different Linux versions differ in this regard?<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Cheers,&nbsp; -- Adrian<br>
<br>
Internet Business Logic<br>
A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English<br>
Online at <a href="http://www.reengineeringllc.com">www.reengineeringllc.com</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Shared use is free<br>
<br>
Adrian Walker<br>
Reengineering<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/3/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tim Niemeyer</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:tim.niemeyer@mastersword.de">tim.niemeyer@mastersword.de</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hallo Ari,<br><br>I have a X61s and have the same problems...<br>What makes this difference on power consumption between windows and linux?<br><br>* Ari El &lt;<a href="mailto:ari.reads@gmail.com">ari.reads@gmail.com</a>&gt; [02-02-08 12:16]:<br>
&gt; From: Ari El &lt;<a href="mailto:ari.reads@gmail.com">ari.reads@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>&gt; To: <a href="mailto:linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org">linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org</a><br>&gt; Subject: Re: [ltp] X60 - (bad) experience, others?<br>
&gt; Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:16:07 -0800 (PST)<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I have an X60s (1702, Core Duo (not core2)) with and 8-cell battery pack.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; What I&#39;d say is: the bad experience on the X60s is with Linux. The machine<br>
&gt; itself is awesome.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I&#39;ve had it for a year and a half; with WinXP it is really fast for most<br>&gt; purposes, runs cold, and after all this time it is still giving me 8 to 9h<br>&gt; of battery life when used for writing (word) and light surfing (wireless<br>
&gt; on), 30 or 40% brightness. Consumption averages an awesome 7.5W, and I&#39;ve<br>&gt; seen it going to 6W with wireless off. It wakes up from hibernation in 15<br>&gt; seconds or so. And all this is with no SSD drive... yet!<br>
&gt;<br>&gt; I installed dual-boot Linux in the x60s the day I bought it, and kept<br>&gt; re-installing all new ubuntu releases. Everything basically works (save for<br>&gt; the fingerprint reader, although I heard it is possible to make it work).<br>
&gt; Even after tweaking, power consumption averages 10 to 11W for the same usage<br>&gt; pattern as above.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I bought the machine to carry it around, so I&#39;m still booting winxp on it. I<br>&gt; can&#39;t wait for the day linux will give me a comparable battery life. I<br>
&gt; switched to linux in every other machine at the office and at home, but not<br>&gt; in my x60s, yet.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I&#39;m sure&nbsp;&nbsp;powertop, the tickless kernel mode and other good work of intel<br>&gt; and other folks will eventually trickle down the chain and we will<br>
&gt; eventually get there. I thought this was going to faster though.<br>I don&#39;t think this things will help for longer battery life... :-(<br><br><br>Tim Niemeyer<br><br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>iD8DBQFHpcmkGbn/Eak8UZYRAgI4AJ0eqa17YBAYbFUPlJHuQy5HqKdfDACguWQT<br>PcQRUwyankzFqmv5AcVK8WE=<br>=J1NW<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_4238_31145345.1202069126418--