[ltp] Thinkwiki: ontribution impossible?

Chris Schumann linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:22:31 -0500


On 04/21/2011 08:37 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Chris Schumann wrote:
>> On 04/21/2011 06:49 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, David Burkhardt wrote:
>>>> Wiki? Why is this Platform called a Wiki anyways? Its just a plain fixed Website which is technically based on a wiki Software.
>>> No, it was an open wiki that was *destroyed* by spammers.
>>>
>>> Just ask for an account, and you will get one.  Or tell us what you want
>>> fixed, and one of the hundreds of account holders that lurk here will be
>>> happy to fix it.
>>>
>>>> The Mistake is in this page:
>>>> http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/TFT_display
>>>>
>>>> Actually there is NO 15.4 Inch Z61T - that model is called Z61m for a reason.
>>>> This Line is just wrong: 	LP154W01-TL06 	Z60m, Z61t, Z61m
>>> Can't you replace the original TFT in a Z61t with a LP154W01-TL06?  If you
>>> can, the page is correct.
>> That just seems wrong. Why put any franken-pad on that page? IMO,
> That page is used by thinkpad repairman and hardware hackers.  Who do you
> think actually tracks down all those TFT models? :-)  Look at the page
> history, and the majority of the commits.
>
>> only factory-allowed options should be on the ThinkWiki. Otherwise,
>> the page for the Z61T should show those options too, but in fact the
>> page only lists 14.1" displays.
> As I said, if the LP154W01-TL06 will NOT fit a Z61t, the page is incorrect
> and needs a fix.  Otherwise...
>
>> (Again, IMO,) ThinkWiki is useful to a buyer of used equipment to
>> see if a machine has been customized. One way to do that is to list
>> factory options so the others stand out.
> Well, that would work, yes.  As long as you list both, you could mark the
> factory ones in bold or something like that without hampering the use of the
> page by hardware hackers.
>
I'm guessing there's no clear policy document on this, but I want to 
understand your opinion. Do you think any IBM or Lenovo option that fits 
in a machine should be listed in the appropriate space? Any compatible 
part from any manufacturer? Only for screens, or perhaps for CPUs, WiFi 
cards, WWAN cards, and (oh boy) optical drives too?

You can see that it becomes unclear where to draw a line.

Thanks,
Chris