[ltp] SIMPLE QUESTIONS -Reply
Chris Hoekstra
chris_hoekstra at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 16 19:41:57 CEST 2003
Ahh, this is great stuff!
I downloaded the cdrom .iso image and first tried it on my main desktop
machine and it worked great. Just out of pure interest, here is some
comparison numbers:
AMD 1600, 512Mb DDR266 (PC2100) memory
L1 Cache: 128k 8551 Mb/sec
L2 Cache: 256k 2838 Mb/sec
Memory: 512Mb 625 Mb/sec
Then I tried to boot the cd on my laptop DVD drive (which DOES support
bootable cd's, but there are some that don't work for some reason) and
it just gave me a black screen with repeating 8000's on each line. No
biggie, the floppy version worked just dandy. Here are the specs for my
Thinkpad 770z:
Intel PII-366 1 at 64Mb IBM, 2 at 128Mb Viking PC100
L1 Cache: 32k 3567 Mb/sec
L2 Cache: 256k 935 Mb/sec
Memory: 319Mb 175 Mb/sec
Tests are running now to find out if there are errors in the memory.
Thanks again for recommending a solution. This should help out.
Chris
Ross Patterson wrote:
>On Wednesday 16 April 2003 11:43 am, Chris Hoekstra wrote:
>
>
>>Has anyone else had any problem with generic laptop memory?
>>
>>
>
>Yes. We have a small pile of ThinkPads here, a mix of 600s, As and Ts. We've
>been very happy with name-brand non-IBM memory (e..g Crucial.Com aka Micron),
>and we've had all sorts of problems with no-brand memory. Problems like
>random lockups, boot failures, etc. We used memtest86
>(http://www.memtest86.com/) to check the DIMMs, and that was the deciding
>factor - the no-brand ones failed all sorts of tests.
>
>We now run tests on all memory we get in, and Crucial.Com always passes all
>tests. We don't pay much more than for no-brand, and we're much happier.
>
>
More information about the Linux-Thinkpad
mailing list