[ltp] Re: mwavem-2.0 released

[Justin Georgeson]

Has a request for the source code been turned down? I thought GPL only 
said you have to provide the source, upon request, to those whom you 
have distributed the binary.

Thomas Hood wrote:
> Thanks for the new release.
> 
> Debian needs clarification of the license on the DSP binaries which
> are included in the package.
> 
> These are supposedly licensed under the GPL, but they come without
> source code.  That doesn't make too much sense, so the validity of
> the license becomes questionable, with the result being that the
> right to distribute the binaries becomes questionable.  Could we
> get some clarification from IBM that we are (at least) free to
> distribute the DSP binaries?
> --
> Thomas Hood
> 
> =====
> Linux on ThinkPad 600 page: http://panopticon.csustan.edu/thood/tp600lnx.htm
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 		
> ____________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" 
> your friends today! Download Messenger Now 
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html

-- 
; Justin Georgeson
; "Free the mallocs, delete the news"
; http://boycott-riaa.com
; http://www.openoffice.org