[ltp] thinkpads with rage128 M3/M4 chips in them
Bill Hudacek
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:36:32 -0600
Just FYI, I don't have *any* dead pixels on this display. It's=20
incredible, but true. And it's more than 3 years old. Seems like LCDs=20
have problems from the factory....or no problems. At least in my=20
experience.
I thought I had one, once........just one dead pixel. I had to view=20
several high-res images to prove it was not in the display (it WAS dust=20
!!! :-)
If the a21p had only supported more than 512MB RAM, I'd be in heaven.
Ok, add the HyperThreading CPU.....and I'd be in heaven.
OK, PCI Express, and I'd *really* be in heaven....
.....No, make that SCSI, and I'd be in heaven.
Wait. SCSI U/W-II with a dual-processor Mobo, two hard drives, two CDROM=20
(one DVD-RW, other CD-RW), 4 GB memory, and I might be happy......for a=20
liitle while.
=20
<sigh> I have to admit, I'm never happy with the computer I have under=20
me. More, better, faster, I must have it all :-)
Have a great weekend, everyone.
Regards,
Bill Hudacek
IBM Global Services
Eben King <eben1@tampabay.rr.com>=20
Sent by: linux-thinkpad-admin@linux-thinkpad.org
08/19/04 12:40 PM
Please respond to
linux-thinkpad
To
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
cc
Subject
Re: [ltp] thinkpads with rage128 M3/M4 chips in them
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Hamie wrote:
> Andr=E9 Wyrwa wrote:
>=20
> >>This laptop has a gorgeous 16x12 display, dual-head supporting=20
> >>different resolutions would be very very useful :-)
> >
> >Must be really big, mine has 4:3 only. ;-)
>=20
> 16:12 is 4:3 :)
Ah, but he said "16x12" not "16:12". But I think Mr. Wyrwa knows about=20
aspect ratios...
> Methinks he meant the 1600x1200 resolution flexview display... Mine has=20
> one too. It just blows the old A20p 1400x1050 display out of the water=20
> in clarity & brightness...
The reason I didn't go for a higher-resolution display when I picked out=20
my Thinkpad was that I figured that while a piece of dust (bigger than a=20
1600x1200 pixel, smaller than a 1024x768 pixel) would get ignored on my=20
display but wouldn't on a higher resolution one, making dead pixels more=20
likely. What's the mean number of dead pixels on 1600x1200 laptop=20
displays, and how many does it take for IBM to consider it faulty?
--=20
-eben ebQenW1@EtaRmpTabYayU.rIr.OcoPm home.tampabay.rr.com/hactar
ARIES: The look on your face will be priceless when you find that 40lb
watermelon in your colon. Trade toothbrushes with an albino dwarf, then
give a hickey to Meryl Streep. -- Weird Al, =5FYour Horoscope for Today=5F
--=20
The linux-thinkpad mailing list home page is at:
http://mailman.linux-thinkpad.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-thinkpad