[ltp] airo_mpi vs. airo
Andreas Kemnade
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:27:23 +0100
--Signature=_Fri__5_Mar_2004_12_27_23_+0100_0ace28Hr6ZKnFDCs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:32:04 +0100
Fabrice Bellet <fabrice@bellet.info> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 09:31:45AM -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Friday 20 February 2004 09:05 am, Eric Covener wrote:
> > > Is it in my best interest to move back to using the airo module for my
> > > minipci airo350? Is there are any difference between the code now, or
> > > will further updates only be applied to the airo module?
> > >
> > Well, I think the main reason is that airo is part of the main kernel codebase
> > now, so you won't have to compile airo_mpi anymore. In my case (I use
> > Mandrake) airo in the current 10.0rc kernel works fine, so after install, the
> > wireless card works out of the box.
>
> Yep, that's right. airo_mpi is now deprecated, since the support for
> MPI350 is included in airo.c in the 2.6 kernel. Backport for 2.4 should
> follow soon. An patch for 2.4.25 is here :
>
I'm using airo_mpi again. I have often the problem that I cannot send but
receive with airo.c in 2.6.3. I have not found the time yet to debug it.
The problem appears mainly in regions with multiple accesspoints which
do not broadcast the ssid. iwconfig shows an access point
In that situations reloading airo.ko does not help. The syslog says
nothing interesting (no tx timeouts). Insmod'ing airo_mpi fixes
the problem at once.
Greetings
Andreas Kemnade
--Signature=_Fri__5_Mar_2004_12_27_23_+0100_0ace28Hr6ZKnFDCs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFASGQhzvqg/Ur2y/sRAvGvAKDMF3Sn1Xc2wj7KpEuM0GNT4sujWwCfVOFC
FYjK5oCh8ou4cIyC1mbh9/8=
=g3kL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Fri__5_Mar_2004_12_27_23_+0100_0ace28Hr6ZKnFDCs--