[ltp] Fresh install of SuSE 9.3 on X30, stick with APM or need to consider ACPI?

[André Wyrwa]

--=-Oy2vMm0/aOoDBWLtPVGZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hei,

seems like you did your homework pretty well. ;-)

> I have found what appear to be pretty complete instructions for setting u=
p
> suspend and hibernation under APM (granted they are for a Debian
> installation but that shouldn't matter, should it?) and various people he=
re
> seem to be happy with APM.  Will I be missing something significant if I
> stick with APM instead of using ACPI?

ACPI should work for the X30. It offers you more flexibility, basically.
Starting with that you don't need an extra hibernation partition as you
figured already.

I'd recommend ACPI, but it might need more effort to get it working
smoothly, than APM does.

Andr=E9.


--=-Oy2vMm0/aOoDBWLtPVGZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBClQZCEOp8fsnyxsQRAmifAJ9RUYe1fICjqTyxuTZaIsw3DeaPeACgijZ6
nZpLCwdo7TZIc/eXQrxltzU=
=3bhK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Oy2vMm0/aOoDBWLtPVGZ--