[ltp] powernowd vs cpufreqd

Thomas Breitner linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:50:53 +0200


Hi,

i've used cpufreq for a while - till the ondemand-governor worked for me
(centrino dothan). with ondemand-governor, you don't need a daemon for
scaling/switching any more. and switching/scaling is so fast that i've
enabled it regardless of on battery/ac (it's a laptop :-)).

there is als a "conservative" version of the ondemand-governor in newer
kernels where you can get a little bit more out of you're battery: if
i'm right, scaling/switching happens not so fast, e.g. no freqswitching
because of some very little cpu-peak.

greetings,
thomas

Am Montag, den 03.10.2005, 12:23 +0000 schrieb Bob Alexander:
> I am using powernowd and find it very useful.
> 
> Is there a comparison of this and other packages such as cpufreqd which 
> will help me understand if it's useful for me to switch ?
> 
> TIA,
> Bob
-- 
_____________________________________________
Thomas Breitner

mail@tombreit.de   |   http://www.tombreit.de