[ltp] Direct Rendering's affect on battery life?
Torsten Wolf
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:40:24 +0200
* Laurent Gilson <pumpkin@gmx.de> [06-04-05 17:35]:
>
>1. the DRI/DRM-part of the driver keeps the CPU awake even if there is
>nothing to do. The CPU will switch to lower frequencies w/o any problems,
>but it will stay in the first 1-2 C-States. W/o DRI/DRM it can enter C3 or
>even C4 which reduce the power needed to run the CPU. Have a look at
>/proc/acpi/processor/CPU/power and the "bus master activity". Optimal for
>a idle desktop is 00000000.
cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU/power
active state: C3
max_cstate: C8
bus master activity: 00000000
states:
C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[001] usage[00000010]
C2: type[C2] promotion[C3] demotion[C1] latency[001] usage[11270220]
*C3: type[C3] promotion[--] demotion[C2] latency[085] usage[08844140]
glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
R52, X300, fglrx 8.23.7, 2.6.15
Regards,
Torsten