[ltp] [ANN] tp_smapi 0.19 adds dates, improves stability
David A. Desrosiers
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Sat, 8 Apr 2006 10:57:18 -0400 (EDT)
> Can you please post a detailed, reproducible description of the
> problem?
# Make the machine drop to its lowest CPU speed, 600Mhz in my
# case:
cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/
echo powersave > cpufreq/scaling_governor
# Check the current frequency
cat cpufreqd/cpuinfo_cur_freq
600000
# Check the maximum frequency at this point
cat cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
2100000
# Crank the machine to its maximum speed:
echo performance > cpufreq/scaling_governor
cat cpufreqd/cpuinfo_cur_freq
2100000
modprobe tp_smapi
cat cpufreqd/cpuinfo_cur_freq
1200000
cat cpufreqd/cpuinfo_max_freq
1200000
The governor was not changed, and still reports "performance",
but tp_smapi upon load, immediately halves the maximum processor
speed, and changing any of those values by echo'ing the proper values
to their counterparts, does not change the behavior.
> BTW, my understanding is that "exercising" the battery by cycling it
> will wear it down badly. Working on the last few percents of
> capacity (i.e., low voltage operation) is especially bad for Li-Ion
> batteries.
In my case, I'm having exactly the opposite results. I
actually have added about 15% of life back into 1 of the batteries by
repeatedly draining and recharging the battery, while the laptop is
unattended and powered off.
I'm sure I won't get back to the full 71280 mWh, but its
better than it was before, and I was about to buy new batteries
anyway, since these are now 4 days out of warrantee, and don't hold
more than 2 hours charge.
I wish *ANY* battery in the T42p would hold more than 2 hours
of charge. The battery ratings I've been reading are completely false,
and are fictitiously 3-4x the actual real-world results I'm getting on
maximum power savings, in either Windows or Linux.
David A. Desrosiers
desrod@gnu-designs.com
http://gnu-designs.com