[ltp] ati or radeon driver?
Alex Deucher
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:42:06 -0500
On 2/18/06, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Also related to an upgrade to dapper, I'm now running X.org 7.0.0 where
> I had been running, uh, 6.x. The old xorg.conf file caused problems, the
> external display didn't work and I think it locked up at least once.
> So I ran Xorg -configure and tweaked a bit and things seem better.
> (Not perfect yet, but I'm still trying to figure out what's wrong.)
>
> I notice that I used to use
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "ATI Technologies, Inc. FireGL Mobility T2 (M10 N=
T)"
> Driver "radeon"
> BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> Option "backingstore" "true"
> Option "RenderAccel" "true"
> Option "MonitorLayout" "LVDS,CRT"
> Option "MetaModes" "1600x1200-1600x1200
> EndSection
>
> But Xorg -configure selected
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Card0"
> Driver "ati"
> VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
> BoardName "M10 NT [FireGL Mobility T2]"
> BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> EndSection
>
> 7.0.0 seems to ship with both the ati and radeon drivers. Are there
> important differences between them? Should I go back to the radeon driver=
?
>
they are the same driver. "ati" is just a wrapper that loads r128,
radeon , or ati_misc depending on the pci id of your card.
Alex
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If man were never to fade away like the
> http://nwalsh.com/ | dews of Adashino, never to vanish like
> | the smoke over Toribeyama, but lingered
> | on forever in the world, how things
> | would lose their power to move us! The
> | most precious thing in life is its
> | uncertainty.--Yoshida Kenko
>
>
>