[ltp] Re: Re: Re: Stress testing for undervolting
Laurent Gilson
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:00:09 +0200
Hello,
>> What i did:
>> - compress my debian with squashfs, load that image at startup into RAM,
>> switch off the HD altogether.
>
> Whoa. I wasn't expecting that. You know, everyone else talking about
> their power consumption was talking about that absolute low in these
> idle moments that are not necessarily the norm. But if I'm reading this
> right, you'll
> probably hitting that low on the average.
Depends on you definition of average. Like i said: i get 3 hours 45
minutes of working with openoffice (writing texts, looking up stuff in the
internet. Not powerpoint/slideshow-animations. And displaylight set on
minimum). Thatīs 10.66 watt average. Playing old DOS games reduces that to
~ 3 hours. Serious development work and iīm down to 2 hours.
If i stop everything but X and the Wlan: ~9.5-10 watt. Depends on the Wlan
signal and traffic.
> 1) How much memory do you have?
1GB. And i really think 1.5 or 2GB would have made the job much more easy.
Next upgrade is 2x1GB SODIMMs (any buyers for 2x 512MB sticks for R51
around ? well tested, 100% error free ?)
> 2) How minimal of a Debian system did you squash?
X, opera, openoffice, apache, acroread, icewm, php, gimp2, perl, java
(SDK), postgresql, scite, python, ethereal, licq, xchat, cups, ... normal
stuff i work with ...
> Here's my current
> system's sizes as reported by `du -si -s`:
my normal /:
3.1M bin
60M boot <= not available in RAM-mode
156k dev
15M etc
7.8G home <= only partly available (+- 225 MB)
4.1k initrd
499M lib <= only modules for 1 kernel
50k lost+found
371M opt <= only vpn, java SDK and rovclock available
4.1k proc
142M root <= not available in RAM-mode
3.5M sbin
4.1k sys
13k tmp
4.0G usr <= share/doc, src and include are not available
431M var <= removed all the stuff from apt, apt-cache, aptdb...
The squashed files:
root@soak:/squashed-dirs# ls -lah
total 472M
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2006-07-16 15:05 .
drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 0 2006-07-16 15:05 ..
-rwx------ 1 root root 1.3M 2006-07-16 15:04 bin.squashed
-rwx------ 1 root root 44M 2006-07-16 15:04 lib.squashed
-rwx------ 1 root root 41M 2006-07-16 15:04 opt.squashed
-rwx------ 1 root root 1.5M 2006-07-16 15:04 sbin.squashed
-rwx------ 1 root root 375M 2006-07-16 15:05 usr.squashed
-rwx------ 1 root root 10M 2006-07-16 15:05 var.squashed
uncompressed sizes for these:
root@soak:/# du -hs bin/ lib/ opt/ sbin/ usr/ var.squashed/
3.0M bin/
105M lib/
94M opt/
3.5M sbin/
984M usr/
110M var.squashed/
(look at var. 10:1 compression ... squashfs 2 rocks)
> I know some of these partitions are already virtual. I just seems
> impossible to fit a full scale system into 512MB and then still have room
> to breathe.
Fully booted the ramfs takes 713 MB. 225MB are user data (/home), 13 MB
/etc. That leaves ~300MB RAM to work with. Not very much. But if i need
more RAM i delete stuff in /home ... or reboot.
Look at knoppix. Itīs a 700MB iso with a shitload of programms, tools and
... uhm ... stuff
> How did you go about selecting what to squash on your system?
Aptitude, deborphan, localpruge and minimalisitc system to start with.
> 3) SquashFS is read-only, right?
Yes. Stuff like /usr, /lib is ro in RAM mode (if something starts writing
in /usr, /lib ... you are in trouble anyway. beside installs/updates...).
rw-files (/etc, /home, /tmp) are stored in ramfs. /var is special:
writeable and compressed. i use unionfs with the squashed file as first
branch and a normal dir in the ramfs for rw-branch. It would be possible
to make the whole thing rw with that approach. BUT since the aptdb/cache
did not fit into the ram anyway ... maybe with 2GB RAM.
Rebulding the *.squashed-files after updates is done by a little script
and takes about 15 min.
> So did you set up your system to have the option (say from a grub menu)
> to boot up with a write-able Debian system?
Yes. The normal disc-based system is started w/o a initrd. If i select the
grub-entry with my modified initrd starts into RAMmode.
At shutdown i copy back /home. If the system crashs all changes since last
reboot are lost. A risk iīm willing to take since the whole thing only
crashed 2 times so far. (out-of-memory because i tried to copy a 3 GB file
into /home and a experiment with rovclock...)
> I don't know much about loading images into RAM (initrd?); the SquashFS
> HOW-TO I found didn't address this explicitly.
squashfs was not made for this. Most technices are borrowed from embedded
systems like the nslu2 and knoppix.
btw.: knoppix works with cloop. Itīs easier to setup (since all scripts
are already there) but also much slower (not a big difference on CD but a
huge hit in RAM) and a bit larger (about 10%).
cu