[ltp] Re: New hard disk for X31?

Bert Haskins linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:43:49 -0400


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050801000906000500090801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Michael wrote:

>Charles E "Rick" Taylor IV wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I don't notice any more fan activity with the Seagate than with the old
>>IBM drive - it still stays off unless the processor runs full speed for
>>a while (editing and re-encoding video, for instance).  But the original
>>IBM drive was certainly *not* inaudible in my X31.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>What was your original drive? Mine was an IBM/Hitachi 40 GB. The spin noise
>of it is really inaudible except from a very very close distance. The
>access sounds are much louder, but they don?t disturb me very much.
> 
>  
>
>>I don't notice much in the way of case vibration with the Seagate, but I
>>*can* hear it.  Doesn't bother me, though, since most of the time it's
>>well under the level of the background noise in my office.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>What about, when you are out of your noisy (?) office? How loud do you feel
>is your new drive when the environment is absolutely quiet? Is the spinning
>sound high level frequency or rather low frequency? Do you hear it from 1 m
>distance, from 10m distance? 
>
>Thanks for the info. The seagate looks promising. I found some reports on it
>in the internet.
>
I hope that you have better luck than I have had.
I bought a Seagate 40G and yes, it is quiet, but is is as slow as a slug.
Slower at 5400 than the 4200 that it replaced.
I think that it must be retrying on reads but I don't think that I can 
send it
back for that reason.
I do wish I could though.

>
>Michael
>
>  
>

--------------050801000906000500090801
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
 content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
Michael wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mide6jm9j$h1d$1@sea.gmane.org">
  <pre wrap="">Charles E "Rick" Taylor IV wrote:

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">I don't notice any more fan activity with the Seagate than with the old
IBM drive - it still stays off unless the processor runs full speed for
a while (editing and re-encoding video, for instance).  But the original
IBM drive was certainly *not* inaudible in my X31.

    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
What was your original drive? Mine was an IBM/Hitachi 40 GB. The spin noise
of it is really inaudible except from a very very close distance. The
access sounds are much louder, but they don?t disturb me very much.
 
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">I don't notice much in the way of case vibration with the Seagate, but I
*can* hear it.  Doesn't bother me, though, since most of the time it's
well under the level of the background noise in my office.

    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
What about, when you are out of your noisy (?) office? How loud do you feel
is your new drive when the environment is absolutely quiet? Is the spinning
sound high level frequency or rather low frequency? Do you hear it from 1 m
distance, from 10m distance? 

Thanks for the info. The seagate looks promising. I found some reports on it
in the internet.</pre>
</blockquote>
I hope that you have better luck than I have had.<br>
I bought a Seagate 40G and yes, it is quiet, but is is as slow as a
slug.<br>
Slower at 5400 than the 4200 that it replaced.<br>
I think that it must be retrying on reads but I don't think that I can
send it<br>
back for that reason.<br>
I do wish I could though.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mide6jm9j$h1d$1@sea.gmane.org">
  <pre wrap="">

Michael

  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------050801000906000500090801--