[ltp] Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 vs 64MB ATI Mobility Radeon x300
Shem Multinymous
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:42:02 +0200
On 3/26/06, L. Mark Stone <lmstone@rnome.com> wrote:
> With ATI you get ATI's binary-only drivers or the barebones ati kernel
> driver. If you use ATI's drivers, you'll need to recompile them
> everytime you do a kernel update. That means you'll need to install a
> build environment as well as the kernel sources. It also means you'll
> need to have some familiarity with boot options and/or init 3, for
> when you update the kernel and forget to recompile the binary driver
> before rebooting.
While ATI's fglrx indeed sucks, it's only necessary if you need
accelerated 3D or if you want the better power saving (which works
only in single-screen mode anyway). Otherwise, X.org's "radeon" drive
does the job nicely.
Shem