[ltp] 2.6.24, lack of CPU affinity on dual core duo causing many
interrupts and high power consumption? CFS a problem?
Marc MERLIN
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:40:02 +1100
I'm still working on my problems of high power draw on now 2.6.24.
(thinkpad Z61p dual core duo)
When I try to quiet everything down, I get this:
> Wakeups-from-idle per second : 1210.7 interval: 10.0s
> Power usage (ACPI estimate): 20.5W (3.2 hours)
>
> Top causes for wakeups:
> 40.0% (507.1) <kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts
> 17.2% (218.3) firefox-bin : futex_wait (hrtimer_wakeup)
> 15.6% (197.7) <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt
> 13.9% (176.2) firefox-bin : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
> 6.1% ( 77.1) <interrupt> : PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad
> 1.8% ( 23.3) Xorg : do_setitimer (it_real_fn)
> 1.3% ( 16.8) <interrupt> : acpi
> 0.9% ( 10.8) <interrupt> : uhci_hcd:usb2, ohci1394, HDA Intel
or if I stop firefox:
> Wakeups-from-idle per second : 211.0 interval: 10.0s
> Power usage (ACPI estimate): 19.7W (3.3 hours)
>
> Top causes for wakeups:
> 39.7% ( 63.6) <kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts
> 19.6% ( 31.4) enlightenment : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
> 7.5% ( 12.0) <interrupt> : acpi
> 6.7% ( 10.7) <interrupt> : uhci_hcd:usb2, ohci1394, HDA Intel
> 6.0% ( 9.6) <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt
> 4.0% ( 6.4) artsd : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
It looks like in both cases, firefox or enlightenment are bouncing back
and forth between my two CPUs, which might be why sometimes I get a
really low 16W power consumption (when the stars align), but otherwise,
I'm closer to 20W or more.
The <kernel IPI> line is new with 2.6.24, and the scheduler that I
switched to CFS.
Should I try other schedulers?
Is there a way to tell the scheduler to just stop using CPU #2 without
shutting the CPU down in a non C3 state?
Or how can I bind enlightenment and firefox to a specific CPU?
If that helps, a typical usage on batteries with wireless looks like
this right now:
PowerTOP version 1.9 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) (20.9%) 2.00 Ghz 2.4%
C1 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 1.67 Ghz 0.0%
C2 0.7ms (52.6%) 1333 Mhz 0.0%
C3 0.5ms (26.4%) 1000 Mhz 97.6%
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 1239.0 interval: 2.0s
Power usage (ACPI estimate): 24.7W (2.9 hours)
Top causes for wakeups:
37.8% (514.0) <kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts
19.4% (264.0) <interrupt> : uhci_hcd:usb2, ohci1394, HDA Intel, iwl3945
-> this is due to wireless being in use.
14.2% (193.0) firefox-bin : futex_wait (hrtimer_wakeup)
12.7% (173.0) firefox-bin : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
10.2% (139.5) <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt
1.5% ( 21.0) Xorg : do_setitimer (it_real_fn)
0.9% ( 12.0) <kernel core> : rs_tx_status (iwl_bg_rate_scale_flush)
0.5% ( 7.0) artsd : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.4% ( 5.0) tpb : do_nanosleep (hrtimer_wakeup)
0.3% ( 4.0) <kernel module> : usb_hcd_poll_rh_status (rh_timer_func)
0.3% ( 3.5) enlightenment : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.2% ( 2.5) firefox-bin : sk_reset_timer (tcp_delack_timer)
0.1% ( 2.0) Eterm.bin : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.1% ( 2.0) <kernel module> : neigh_table_init_no_netlink (neigh_periodic_ti
0.1% ( 1.5) pidgin : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.1% ( 1.5) <kernel core> : sk_reset_timer (tcp_delack_timer)
0.1% ( 1.0) <interrupt> : PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad
0.1% ( 1.0) atieventsd : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
As you can see, nothing great. It's actually worse than with 2.6.22 I'm
pretty sure, probably because of the CFS scheduler and that <kernel IPI>
Thanks for any suggestions,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/