[ltp] The mystery of missing RAM
James Knott
linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:58:41 -0400
David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 21:19 -0700, Bernard Tremblay wrote:
>> Did you check in the BIOS setup if your hole 4Gb was seen. It should
>> be totally seen by the BIOS. May be there is other stuff that sit on
>> your motherboard (sound card, network card, modem, IBM stuff ?...)
>> and this use some memory from the main board.
>
> I'm skeptical. Why would a modem use physical system RAM? Why would a
> sound card use physical system RAM?
They don't use physical RAM, they use memory address space. To prevent
conflict, the physical memory is disabled in that range.
>
> More-importantly, why did this design change?
Aug 1981. That goes back to the days of the original PC where of the 1
MB address range, only 640K was available for RAM. Other systems did
similar.
>
> MY T42p has none of these problems, and sees the full 4GB of RAM, runs a
> 32-bit OS, and has an integrated graphics adapter.
>
> Now that I've "upgraded" to an Intel Core 2 Duo, discrete (external)
> graphics, etc. I lose 25% of my physical RAM. I may sell these two
> laptops and go back to my T42p if I can't solve this.
>
>
--
Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org>