[ltp] Any of these Linux 2.6.37 messages I should worry about?

[linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org]

Any of these selected dmesg(1) messages I see everyday that I should worr=
y about?

Linux version 2.6.37-1-686 (Debian 2.6.37-1) (ben@decadent.org.uk) (gcc v=
ersion 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-10) ) #1 SMP Tue Feb 15 18:21:50 UTC 2011
Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection missing in CPU or disabled in BIO=
S!
DMI: 1834NV1/1834NV1, BIOS 1WET90WW (2.10 ) 12/08/2006
ACPI Warning: 32/64X length mismatch in Gpe1Block: 0/32 (20101013/tbfadt-=
526)
ACPI Warning: Optional field Gpe1Block has zero address or length: 0x0000=
00000000102C/0x0 (20101013/tbfadt-557)
ns_cgroup deprecated: consider using the 'clone_children' flag without th=
e ns_cgroup.
HEST: Table is not found!
thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.24
thinkpad_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad BIOS 1WET90WW (2.10 ), EC 1VHT28WW-1.04
thinkpad_acpi: IBM ThinkPad R50e, model 1834NV1
thinkpad_acpi: detected a 8-level brightness capable ThinkPad
Registered led device: tpacpi::thinklight
Registered led device: tpacpi::power
Registered led device: tpacpi::standby
thinkpad_acpi: brightness: will use unverified default: brightness_mode=3D=
3
thinkpad_acpi: brightness: please report to ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourcefo=
rge.net whether it works well or not on your ThinkPad
[drm:intel_panel_get_max_backlight] *ERROR* fixme: max PWM is zero.

I Google=E2=84=A2d a few and they were in various states of acknowledgmen=
t, but
I hereby post them here nonetheless.