[ltp] Re: double checking Debian's 686-pae vs. -486 probe

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

--ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 05:32:08PM +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> JM> How about trying a =93grep pae /proc/cpuinfo=94 instead of looking for
> JM> approximate CPU descriptions?
> And indeed lshw says
>           product: Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.40GHz
>           capabilities: fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 s=
ep mtrr pge mca cmov clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe up bts
>=20
> I.e., no pae.
>=20
> So I would add "often" in the Description:
Or specifically mention early Centrino CPUs not having PAE support.

--=20
WBR, wRAR

--ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=Mn/R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv--