[ltp] Slackware on T42?
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:38:50 -0600
On Monday 27 December 2004 22:27, Josh Battles wrote:
> > Whether you use LILO or GRUB for your boot loader, either will
> > automagically boot to the Windows boot loader if you choose to boot
> > into Windows. Otherwise, they'll boot your favorite Linux kernel
> Well, I'd like to not have to use LILO or GRUB for this install. I
You must. There is no getting around it.
> know that there's a way to configure the windows boot loader menu to
> load linux.
Actually not quite: it can boot a bootable partition, whatever the OS,
but that partition must have its own boot loader ... that's where LILO
In fact LILO's no different from ntldr in that regard: it cannot boot
Windows directly. It can only boot the boot loader from another OS. I
don't know about GRUB - never saw fit to mess with it.
> That's what I'm looking for here. I've been using linux
IMO it's a tossup. Neither ntldr nor LILO has any special benefit over
the other, as the initial boot loader (the one called by the BIOS.)
LILO has some features ntldr does not, like a boot password, which is
something which might be of interest for a laptop.
There was an old HOWTO about using the NT4 boot loader for Linux.
AFAICT Win2K and XP still use the same ntldr, with a little bit of
cosmetic work. That HOWTO will tell you how to set up ntldr to boot
LILO (also applies to GRUB.)
I don't dual boot, but if I did (when I did, a long time ago) I'd have
the BIOS call LILO.
If you're going to have a DOS partition, DOS (with loadlin.exe) is a
fine boot loader for Linux. That's another option to consider. I do
have a FreeDOS partition (with a hibernation file) on mine.
mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
or "not-spam" is in Subject: header