[ltp] kernel 2.6.10 Error getting context for object

Tino Keitel linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:04:27 +0100


On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:48:14 -0500, Alejandro Duque wrote:
> hi all, after upgrading to a kernel 2.6.10 im getting this errors, i dont
> know if i have to uncheck a kernel option related to acpi to get rid of
> them...i havent had any xtrange failure, only thing is i havent been able
> to get DRI back to work..no rendering ( cause i also decided to upgrade
> xorg and now all is a mess.
> 
> has any of you and idea about this error? gracie /a
> 
> 
> root # dmesg | grep acpi
>  tbxface-0118 [02] acpi_load_tables      : ACPI Tables successfully acquired
> evxfevnt-0094 [03] acpi_enable           : Transition to ACPI mode successful
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c18faaa8]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c19017a8]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c1906d28]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c1908668]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c19080e8]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c190ade8]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c190ac68]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c190a8a8]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c190d828]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c190ef68]
> acpi_bus-0081 [06] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c190e468]
> ibm_acpi: IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.8
> ibm_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
> acpi_bus-0081 [04] acpi_bus_get_device   : Error getting context for
> object [c1906d28]
> ibm_acpi: dock device not present


Maybe it's the same behaviour like as described in 
<http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/6/268>?

Regards,
Tino